At the National Constitution Center, we value civil dialogue, which empowers students to speak about constitutional and historical topics in ways that remain civil, respectful, and reflective. As you prepare to discuss these topics in your classroom, we encourage you to establish norms such as:
- Stay calm
- Listen patiently
- Listen actively
- Don’t speak twice until everybody has spoken once
You can find more support for establishing norms and civil dialogue practices in our Civil Dialogue Toolkit.
Media Asset
National Constitution Center's Constitution Daily Blog - The Constitution and the SAVE America Act, by Scott Bomboy
Big Constitutional Question
What role does the Constitution set out for Congress to play in federal elections?
Headline Story
In March 2026, the Senate kicked off an extended debate about the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) America Act, a proposed bill that would require photo identification for voters in federal elections and proof of citizenship to register to vote.
The House had already passed a version of the bill on Feb. 11, 2026, in a 218-213 vote largely along party lines, with one Democrat, Henry Cuellar of Texas, voting with House Republicans in favor of the bill.
Observers widely expected that the Senate’s filibuster rules (requiring a 60-vote threshold to overcome a filibuster) would prevent a full vote on the floor, but the act and the debate that followed have touched on several constitutional issues.
On March 27, 2026, the SAVE Act failed to advance in the Senate before the chamber recessed for two weeks. A procedural vote to attach the legislation to another bill failed 48-50 on April 22, 2026, with some Republicans joining Democrats to oppose it. The bill remains active for consideration. Some Republican leaders have proposed including parts of the act in a budget reconciliation process this fall, with such a measure only requiring a simple majority for approval. However, it might still face certain obstacles due to Senate procedures.
When considering this headline, the first question is, does Congress have the constitutional authority to enact a certain law. The next question is whether there are other provisions that take that power away from Congress. Keep these questions in mind as you explore the constitutional question: What role does the Constitution set out for Congress to play in federal elections?
Amendment / Clause Focus
- Article I, Section IV: The Elections Clause
- "The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations..."
Scholar Perspectives
Scholar
Key Ideas & Quote
Why It Matters
Michael T. Morley
Assistant Professor of Law at Florida State University College of Law
Franita Tolson
Vice Dean for Faculty and Academic Affairs and Professor of Law at the University of Southern California Gould School of Law
“Although the Elections Clause makes states primarily responsible for regulating congressional elections, it vests ultimate power in Congress. Congress may pass federal laws regulating congressional elections that automatically displace (“preempt”) any contrary state statutes, or enact its own regulations concerning those aspects of elections that states may not have addressed.”
This passage underscores Congress’ power to enact legislation shaping federal elections like the SAVE Act. It addresses why Congress has the authority to initiate such acts, and how the federal election process is a matter of federalism.
Michael T. Morley
Assistant Professor of Law at Florida State University College of Law
“The power to make the rules governing the electoral process is perhaps the most important power conferred by the Constitution. By drawing congressional district boundaries differently, enhancing or weakening measures to protect the integrity of the electoral process, changing the standards concerning vote counting, or modifying any of dozens of other rules concerning elections, it often is possible to systematically help candidates from one political party over the other. The government officials empowered to determine the rules governing an election therefore can exert a tremendous influence over the election’s outcome!”
Morley points out an important debate in the federal election process – who has the authority to set the rules for federal elections? He argues that the Elections Clause says the rules are set by each state’s “Legislature”, but Congress can override them. He emphasizes his disagreement with the Supreme Court over what the definition of “Legislature” is and stresses his viewpoint about legislatures needing to be defined as only the elected legislative body (like a state assembly). This would impact the structure of election power in the U.S and could shape how laws like the SAVE Act could be implemented, challenged, or limited.
Franita Tolson
Vice Dean for Faculty and Academic Affairs and Professor of Law at the University of Southern California Gould School of Law
“In the last century-and-a-half, . . . Congress became more aggressive in exercising its authority under the [Elections] Clause, imposing substantive requirements that states must follow in structuring federal elections. These requirements have included, for example, laying down minimum criteria for the states to follow regarding compactness, contiguity, and single member districting for U.S. House elections; instituting uniform voter registration standards for federal elections through the National Voter Registration Act; and modernizing state voting systems through the Help America Vote Act.”
Tolson focuses her argument on the power that the Elections Clause grants Congress to shape election rules nationwide. She details how Congress has set baseline standards for how federal elections must operate. Applied to something like the SAVE Act, this interpretation helps explain why Congress might believe it has the authority to act in the first place. To pass constitutional muster, federal legislation like the SAVE Act must also not conflict with other provisions of the Constitution.
Primary Source Spotlights
Download Think, Talk, Create PDF
Student Questions
- The blog post mentions the Elections Clause of Article I, Section 4, of the Constitution to help explain the questions surrounding the proposed SAVE Act. In your own words, explain how this clause divides election authority between states and Congress. Use the text of Article I, Section 4, and the blog post to support your response.
- If the SAVE America Act were to become law, what changes to federal voter registration process would it require? Look at the explanation of the Save America Act in the blog post to support your response.
- How does the federal election process illustrate the concept of federalism in action? Use examples from the blog post to support your answer.
Student Choice Options
- An essential component of current event news is translating the constitutional analysis into clear public content for community engagement. Create an engaging, but accurate, newspaper headline, social media post, or infographic that captures the main ideas behind the SAVE America Act and the constitutional questions it raises.
- Using the primary sources listed below (and found in the blog post), create a timeline that traces how Congress has used the Elections Clause to regulate federal elections from 1993 to today. Annotate each entry with an explanation and state how state and congressional roles shifted, or would shift, because of the law.
- National Voter Registration Act of 1993
- Help America Vote Act of 2002
- SAVE America Act (proposed House bill, 2026)
- Respond to the constitutional question at the heart of this Constitution in the Headlines: What role does the Constitution set out for Congress to play in federal elections? Defend your position by citing the blog post, related constitutional clauses, and election laws. Then, engage in civil dialogue among your peers to defend your position.
- Note to teacher: This can be done in a Socratic Seminar or Fishbowl format.
Beyond the Headlines
- Interactive Constitution
- Article I, Section IV: The Elections Clause
- Select Voter Laws
- Historical Look at Voting Rights
- Constitution Daily blog post: The Evolution of Voting Rights in America (Angelys Torres McBride, May 27, 2021)
- We the People podcast: A Constitutional History of the Right to Vote (July 21, 2020)
- Select Supreme Court Cases About Voting Rights
- Supreme Court Cases Library: Shelby County v. Holder (2013)
- Crawford v. Marion County Election Board (2008)
- Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona (2013)