We The People

Civil Discourse and the Supreme Court

July 16, 2026

In this episode, legal scholars Jonathan AdlerGreg GarreKatherine Mims Crocker, and Howard Wasserman discuss the state of civil discourse inside the Supreme Court and in public debate about the Court. Julie Silverbrook, chief content and learning officer at the National Constitution Center, moderates. This conversation was recorded live in Philadelphia on July 7, 2026, as part of the National Constitution Center’s 2026 Supreme Court Review, which is presented in partnership with the Center on the Structural Constitution at Texas A&M University School of Law. The program featured three panels with scholars of differing perspectives examining the Court’s 2025–2026 term, its approach to executive power, and civil discourse surrounding the Court. 

Follow We the PeopleLive at the National Constitution Center, and Civic Parenting on Apple PodcastsSpotify, or your favorite podcast app. 

This episode was produced and mixed by Bill Pollock. It was recorded by David Stotz and Greg Schekler. With production support from Charles Sahm. Research was provided by Anna Salvatore, Trey Sullivan, and Tristan Worsham. 

 

Participants 

Jonathan Adler is the Cabell Research Professor and Tazewell Taylor Professor of Law at William & Mary Law School. He is the author or editor of seven books, including Business and the Roberts Court. Adler is a regular contributor to the legal blog The Volokh Conspiracy, and often appears on popular television and radio programs to discuss constitutional and regulatory issues. 

Gregory Garre is a partner at Latham & Watkins. He has served as the 44th Solicitor General of the United States (2008–2009), the Principal Deputy Solicitor General (2005–2008), and as an Assistant to the Solicitor General (2000–2004); the only person to have held all of those positions within the Office of the Solicitor General. Garre has argued 51 cases before the Supreme Court and has briefed and served as counsel of record in hundreds of additional cases before the Court at both the merits and certiorari stage. 

Katherine Mims Crocker is professor of law at Cornell Law School. Previously, she taught at the Texas A&M University School of Law and William & Mary Law School, and served as the inaugural faculty director of the Texas A&M Center on the Structural Constitution. Before entering academia, Crocker clerked for U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. 

Howard Wasserman is professor of law and associate dean for research and faculty development at Florida International University Law School, where he teaches civil procedure, evidence, federal courts, civil rights, and First Amendment. He blogs at PrawfsBlawg, is the section editor for the Courts Law Section of JOTWELL, and is a contributor at SCOTUSblog. 

Julie Silverbrook is chief content and learning officer at the National Constitution Center, where she leads the strategy, development, and delivery of the Center’s content, public programs, and educational initiatives, advancing its mission of nonpartisan constitutional education and civil dialogue. She oversees the creation of public-facing constitutional content and works to ensure the Center’s programs, scholarly engagement, and educational resources operate as a coordinated national strategy serving students, educators, families, and lifelong learners across the country. 

 

Additional Resources

 

Stay Connected and Learn More 

  • Stay connected with We the People—follow, rate, and review the show wherever you listen. 
  • Questions or comments? Email [email protected]
  • Follow @ConstitutionCtr on social media and sign up to receive Constitution Weekly, our email roundup of constitutional news and debate. 
  • Support our important work by making a donation today. 

⁠⁠⁠⁠Donate

Loading...

Explore Further

Podcast
The Supreme Court and Executive Power

Scholars Gillian Metzger, Julian Mortenson, and Ilya Somin explore the Supreme Court’s approach to executive power

Town Hall Video
2026 Supreme Court Review: Key Decisions, Executive Power, Civil Discourse

The National Constitution Center and the Center on the Structural Constitution at Texas A&M University School of Law present the…

Blog Post
The Supreme Court in Review: Another Landmark Term

On June 30, 2026, the Supreme Court concluded issuing opinions for its October Term 2025. The session was marked by several…

Educational Video
Article III and Supreme Court Term Review Featuring Ali Velshi (All Levels)

For our final Fun Friday Session of the 2022-2023 school year, MSNBC’s Ali Velshi returns, joining National Constitution Center…

Donate

Support Programs Like These

Your generous support enables the National Constitution Center to hear the best arguments on all sides of the constitutional issues at the center of American life. As a private, nonprofit organization, we rely on support from corporations, foundations, and individuals.

Donate Today