Summary
This case is the most important of the Supreme Court’s recent cases expounding on Congress’s powers to regulate interstate commerce and to tax and spend. At issue are two provisions of the Affordable Care Act. First is the individual mandate, which required individuals to purchase health insurance and, if they did not do so, to pay a penalty. Second is the Medicaid expansion, which made federal funding for Medicaid contingent upon state expansions of their eligibility requirements for that program. The Court determined that the individual mandate was not valid under the Commerce Clause because Congress cannot use that power to require someone to buy health insurance. However, the Court did uphold it as a valid use of Congress’ taxing power, treating the penalty for failure to purchase insurance as a tax. Lastly, the Court concluded that the Medicaid expansion was an unconstitutional use of the spending power because it did not offer states a genuine choice on acceptance and thus was coercive.