We The People

The Supreme Court Considers the Independent State Legislature Theory

December 15, 2022

On December 7, 2022, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Moore v. Harper, a case out of North Carolina about the power of state courts to review election regulations set by state legislatures. At the heart of the case is the “independent state legislature” theory, an interpretation of the Constitution that would give state legislatures essentially the sole power to regulate federal elections and would restrict the involvement from state courts in reviewing those decisions. Joining us to recap the oral arguments in Moore v. Harper is Vikram Amar, dean of Illinois College of Law; and Jason Torchinsky, partner at Holtzman Vogel. Jeffrey Rosen, president and CEO of the National Constitution Center, moderates.

• Check out What is the “Independent State Legislature Doctrine”? – Part 1 and Part 2 from March 2022 and July 2022, respectively.

 

Please subscribe to We the People and Live at the National Constitution Center on Apple Podcasts, Stitcher, or your favorite podcast app.

This episode was produced by Melody Rowell and engineered by Dave Stotz. Research was provided by Sophia Gardell, Sam Desai, and Lana Ulrich.

 

Participants

Vikram Amar is the dean of the Illinois College of Law. He is a co-author (along with Akhil Reed Amar and Steven Calabresi) of the sixth edition of the six-volume Treatise on Constitutional Law (2021). He is also a co-author (along with Jonathan Varat) of Constitutional Law: Cases and Materials (2017), a co-author on multiple volumes of the Wright & Miller Federal Practice and Procedure Treatise (2006), and a co-author (along with John Oakley) of a one-volume treatise on American Civil Procedure (2008) He writes a biweekly column on constitutional matters for Justia.com and a monthly column on legal education for abovethelaw.com.

Jason Torchinsky is a partner at Holtzman Vogel, specializing in campaign finance, election law, lobbying disclosure and issue advocacy groups. He has served as counsel in a number of litigation matters dealing with First Amendment freedoms and election law and redistricting issues, including Harris v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission. He has filed numerous amicus briefs with the U.S. Supreme Court, including one on behalf of the National Republican Senatorial and Congressional Committees, which was cited in the Court’s opinion in McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission.

Jeffrey Rosen is the president and CEO of the National Constitution Center, a nonpartisan nonprofit organization devoted to educating the public about the U.S. Constitution. Rosen is also professor of law at The George Washington University Law School and a contributing editor of The Atlantic.


Additional Resources

 

Transcript

View the Transcript

This transcript may not be in its final form, accuracy may vary, and it may be updated or revised in the future.

 

Stay Connected and Learn More

Questions or comments about the show? Email us at [email protected].

Continue today’s conversation on Facebook and Twitter using @ConstitutionCtr.

Sign up to receive Constitution Weekly, our email roundup of constitutional news and debate, at bit.ly/constitutionweekly.

Loading...

Explore Further

Podcast
Can Tennessee Ban Medical Transitions for Transgender Minors?

Reviewing oral arguments in U.S. v. Skrmetti

Town Hall Video
Woodrow Wilson: The Light Withdrawn

Christopher Cox, former U.S. congressman and author of the new book, Woodrow Wilson: The Light Withdrawn, and Professor Geoffrey…

Blog Post
The Constitution and the Postal System

President-elect Donald Trump has revived talk from his previous term of moving to privatize the United States Postal System. To be…

Educational Video
AP Court Case Review Featuring Caroline Fredrickson (All Levels)

In this fast-paced and fun session, Caroline Fredrickson, one of the legal scholars behind the National Constitution Center’s…

Donate

Support Programs Like These

Your generous support enables the National Constitution Center to hear the best arguments on all sides of the constitutional issues at the center of American life. As a private, nonprofit organization, we rely on support from corporations, foundations, and individuals.

Donate Today