We The People

Can Courts End Partisan Gerrymandering?

March 23, 2023

Share

Last week, the North Carolina Supreme Court agreed to re-hear a case that found the state’s redistricting maps unconstitutional under the state’s constitution. The outcome of this decision could affect another case already before the U.S. Supreme Court, Moore v. Harper—a challenge to a decision striking down North Carolina’s redistricting that involves the “independent state legislature” doctrine. Why did the North Carolina Supreme Court strike down the maps in the first place, and why is it revisiting that decision now? Will the U.S. Supreme Court still decide the Moore case and rule on the independent state legislature theory? And what standards should be used to decide whether redistricting maps are politically gerrymandered? To discuss these questions and address the latest developments in these crucial gerrymandering cases, Misha Tseytlin of the law firm Troutman Pepper and Guy-Uriel Charles of Harvard Law School join host Jeffrey Rosen.

Please subscribe to We the People and Live at the National Constitution Center on Apple Podcasts, Stitcher, or your favorite podcast app.

Today’s episode was produced by Lana Ulrich, Bill Pollock, and Sam Desai. It was engineered by Greg Scheckler. Research was provided by Sophia Gardell, Emily Campbell, Liam Kerr, Sam Desai, and Lana Ulrich.   
    

Participants 

Misha Tseytlin is a partner at the law firm Troutman Pepper. He argued and won the 2018 partisan gerrymandering case Gill v. Whitford before the Supreme Court, and he filed amicus briefs in Moore v. Harper as well as another major gerrymandering case, Rucho v. Common Cause

Guy-Uriel Charles is the Charles J. Ogletree Jr. Professor of Law at Harvard Law School, where he also directs the Charles Hamilton Institute for Race and Justice. He was appointed by President Joe Biden to the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States. He also filed an amicus brief in Rucho v. Common Cause.

Jeffrey Rosen is the president and CEO of the National Constitution Center, a nonpartisan nonprofit organization devoted to educating the public about the U.S. Constitution. Rosen is also professor of law at The George Washington University Law School and a contributing editor of The Atlantic
 

Additional Resources  

 

Transcript

View the Transcript

This transcript may not be in its final form, accuracy may vary, and it may be updated or revised in the future.

 

Stay Connected and Learn More

Questions or comments about the show? Email us at [email protected].

Continue today’s conversation on Facebook and Twitter using @ConstitutionCtr.

Sign up to receive Constitution Weekly, our email roundup of constitutional news and debate, at bit.ly/constitutionweekly.

Loading...

Explore Further

Podcast
The Supreme Court Says States Can’t Keep Trump Off the Ballot

Breaking down the Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling that individual states cannot bar insurrectionists from holding federal…

Town Hall Video
Democracy Checkup: Preparing for the 2024 Election

Legal experts Richard Hasen, Sarah Isgur, and Lawrence Lessig provide a health check on the state of American democracy in the…

Blog Post
Once again, Supreme Court dives into abortion fray

The only people who may have actually believed the Supreme Court was getting out of the abortion issue by eliminating the…

Educational Video
AP Court Case Review Featuring Caroline Fredrickson (All Levels)

In this fast-paced and fun session, Caroline Fredrickson, one of the legal scholars behind the National Constitution Center’s…

More from the National Constitution Center
Constitution 101

Explore our new 15-unit core curriculum with educational videos, primary texts, and more.

Media Library

Search and browse videos, podcasts, and blog posts on constitutional topics.

Founders’ Library

Discover primary texts and historical documents that span American history and have shaped the American constitutional tradition.

News & Debate