The Future of Abortion Laws at the Supreme Court
Two leading voices from organizations on different sides of today's biggest debates over reproductive rights and abortion laws—Catherine Glenn Foster of Americans United for Life and Dr. Kelli Garcia of National Women's Law Center—join host Jeffrey Rosen to explore the key cases making their way up to the Supreme Court. Garcia and Foster also share their views on landmark abortion precedent like Roe v. Wade, Planned Parenthood v. Casey, and the more recent case Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt, and predict how precedent might affect the outcomes of challenges to pending abortion laws at the federal level and in states like Louisiana, Tennessee, and Mississippi.
An early transcript of the podcast is linked here. The text may not be in its final form, accuracy may vary, and it may be updated or revised in the future.
Catherine Glenn Foster is President and CEO of Americans United for Life. She has litigated numerous constitutional, abortion and maternal health cases, and testified on such issues before Congress and other federal and state bodies. She previously worked as Litigation Counsel at Alliance Defending Freedom.
Kelli Garcia is Director of Reproductive Justice Initiatives and senior counsel at the National Women’s Law Center. Prior to joining the Center, Dr. Garcia was a law fellow at the O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, researching global health, human rights, and health care reform. She also holds a Ph.D. in social psychology from UCLA.
Jeffrey Rosen is the President and Chief Executive Officer of the National Constitution Center, the only institution in America chartered by Congress “to disseminate information about the United States Constitution on a nonpartisan basis.”
- Roe v. Wade (1973)
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey (1992)
- Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt (2016)
- Dissent by Justice Kavanaugh, June Medical Services v. Gee (2019)
Our Interactive Constitution is the leading digital resource about the debates and text behind the greatest vision of human freedom in history, the U.S. Constitution. Here, scholars from across the legal and philosophical spectrum interact with each other to explore the meaning of each provision of our founding document.
The Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause by Nathan S. Chapman and Kenji Yoshino
This episode was engineered by Kevin Kilbourne and produced by Jackie McDermott. Research was provided by Lana Ulrich, Jackie McDermott, Ben Roebuck, and Madison Poulter.
Stay Connected and Learn More
Questions or comments about the show? Email us at [email protected]
Continue today’s conversation on Facebook and Twitter using @ConstitutionCtr.
Sign up to receive Constitution Weekly, our email roundup of constitutional news and debate, at bit.ly/constitutionweekly.