On December 8, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Evenwel v. Abbott, one of the most important cases of the term that could have huge implications for U.S. politics.
In 2013, the Texas state legislature drew up district maps in order to fill 31 seats in the state senate, as required by the Texas constitution. To do so, the legislature started with the total population and divided by 31, seeking to equalize the number of people across the districts.
But two registered and active voters, Sue Evenwel and Edward Pfenninger, challenged the redistricting plan. They argued that they were underrepresented because the state looked only at total population. Had legislators used the total number of registered voters, they said, the state would be much closer to meeting the Supreme Court’s “one person, one vote” requirement.
Rick Hasen is the Chancellor’s Professor of Law and Political Science at the University of California, Irvine School of Law. He is an expert in election and campaign finance law, and the author of the authoritative Election Law Blog.
Ilya Shapiro is a senior fellow in constitutional studies at the Cato Institute in Washington and editor-in-chief of the Cato Supreme Court Review. He is also a member of the Center’s Coalition of Freedom Advisory Board.
Download this episode (right click and save)
— Ilya Shapiro (@ishapiro) October 15, 2015
This show was engineered by Jason Gregory and produced by Nicandro Iannacci. Research was provided byJoshua Waimberg and Danieli Evans. The host of We the People is Jeffrey Rosen.
We want to know what you think of the podcast! Email us at [email protected].
Please subscribe to We the People. While you’re in the iTunes Store, leave us a review—it helps other people discover what we do.
Please also subscribe to Live at America’s Town Hall, featuring lectures and debates presented at the Center, across from Independence Hall in Philadelphia.
We the People is a member of the Panoply network. Check out all of our sibling podcasts at iTunes.com/Panoply.
Despite our congressional charter, the National Constitution Center is a private nonprofit—we receive little government support, and we rely on the generosity of people around the country who are inspired by our nonpartisan mission of constitutional debate and education. Please consider becoming a member to support our work, including this podcast. Visit constitutioncenter.org to learn more.
Recent Stories on Constitution Daily
Justice Antonin Scalia rails again about flag-burning “weirdoes”
Constitution Check: Is the new immigration policy at risk constitutionally?
Podcast: Is the death penalty unconstitutional?