On January 27, President Donald Trump signed an executive order temporarily suspending refugee admissions to the United States and travel from several countries in the Middle East. In the immediate aftermath of the order, several lawsuits were filed, and multiple judges have issued stays against parts of the order.
What are the best constitutional and statutory arguments for and against the order's legality?
Peter Spiro holds the Charles Weiner Chair in international law at the Temple University Beasley School of Law. He is the author of Beyond Citizenship: American Identity After Globalization and At Home in Two Countries: The Past and Future of Dual Citizenship.
Anil Kalhan is associate professor of law at the Drexel University Thomas R. Kline School of Law. He is Chair of the New York City Bar Association’s International Human Rights Committee and a Visiting Scholar at the Center for the Study of Law and Society at the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law.
We want to know what you think of the podcast! Email us at [email protected].
We the People is a member of Slate’s Panoply network. Check out the full roster at Panoply.fm.
Despite our congressional charter, the National Constitution Center is a private nonprofit; we receive little government support, and we rely on the generosity of people around the country who are inspired by our nonpartisan mission of constitutional debate and education. Please consider becoming a member to support our work, including this podcast. Visit constitutioncenter.org to learn more.
Recent Stories on Constitution Daily
The Constitution and the cabinet nomination process
Supreme Court nominations 101: What happens next?
Podcast: Has President Trump violated the Emoluments Clause?