Constitution Daily

Smart conversation from the National Constitution Center

Podcast: Is the Constitution color-blind?

October 15, 2015 by NCC Staff


Justice John Marshall Harlan (credit: Wikimedia Commons)

The idea of the “color-blind” Constitution comes from Justice John Marshall Harlan’s lone dissent in the 1896 Supreme Court case, Plessy v. Ferguson, in which the Court upheld “separate but equal” racial segregation in public accommodations:

Our Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens. In respect of civil rights, all citizens are equal before the law.

The broader issue of race and the Constitution extends back to our nation’s founding, when delegates to the 1787 Constitutional Convention compromised on the issue of slavery.


It continued through the Civil War and Reconstruction Era, in which the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments were ratified. At Gettysburg, President Abraham Lincoln said the period brought a “new birth of freedom.”


And in the mid-20th century, the United States witnessed a “Second Reconstruction” in the civil rights movement. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 were passed, and the Supreme Court handed its landmark ruling in Brown v. Board of Education.


Now, in the modern era, the idea of the “color-blind” Constitution is resurging with opposition to affirmative action. This year, the Supreme Court will rule again on the issue in the case of Fisher v. University of Texas.


Can skin color or race ever be a legitimate justification for legal or political distinctions? And should “color-conscious” policies be presumptively unconstitutional, regardless of their intent?


Theodore Shaw is the Julius L. Chambers Distinguished Professor of Law and Director of the Center for Civil Rights at the University of North Carolina School of Law at Chapel Hill.


Michael Rosman is general counsel at the Center for Individual Rights in Washington, DC.


Download this episode (right click and save)


This show was engineered and edited by Jason Gregory. It was produced by Nicandro Iannacci. Research was provided by Joshua Waimberg and Danieli Evans.


Get the latest constitutional news, and continue today’s conversation, on our Facebook page and Twitter feed.


We want to know what you think of the podcast! Send your questions, comments and suggestions to [email protected].


Please subscribe to We the People. While you’re in the iTunes Store, leave us a review—it helps other people discover what we do.


Please also subscribe to Live at America’s Town Hall, featuring lectures and debates presented at the Center, across from Independence Hall in Philadelphia.


We the People is a member of the Panoply network. Check out all of our sibling podcasts at


Despite our congressional charter, the National Constitution Center is a private nonprofit—we receive little government support, and we rely on the generosity of people around the country who are inspired by our nonpartisan mission of constitutional debate and education. Please consider becoming a member to support our work, including this podcast. Visit to learn more.


Recent Stories on Constitution Daily


Constitution Check: Do Obamacare rules do enough to protect religious employers?


10 influential Hispanic Americans in U.S. politics


Video: Policing in a Democratic Society


Sign up for our email newsletter