On May 18, 1896, the Supreme Court’s Plessy v. Ferguson decision upheld the legality of racial segregation in America. Plessy was later overturned, and it holds a controversial place in the Court’s legacy.
Legal experts and historians have relegated Plessy to the “dustbin of history.” Back in 2009, journalist David Savage, writing for the ABA Journal, looked at how liberals, moderates, and conservatives viewed controversial Supreme Court cases.
Depending on ideology, cases involving the outcome of the 2000 presidential election, abortion, marijuana usage, eminent domain, campaign contributions and Social Security were on the “worst-case” lists, Savage said. But a special place was reserved for what he called “crossover” cases.
“Historians and court scholars agree on a pair of 19th century opinions: Dred Scott v. Sandford, the 1857 ruling that upheld slavery even in the free states, and Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896, which condoned segregation as ‘separate but equal.’ The World War II decision Korematsu v. United States (1944) is usually cited as well,” Savage said.
In the Plessy case, a man named Homer Plessy refused to give up his seat on a train in New Orleans, as he was required to do by Louisiana state law. He told the conductor he was 1/8th African-American. Plessy was arrested. Plessy claimed the Louisiana law separating blacks from whites violated the "equal protection clause" of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
The Supreme Court decided by a 7-1 margin that “separate but equal” public facilities could be provided to different racial groups.
In his majority opinion, Justice Henry Billings Brown pointed to schools as an example of the legality of segregation.
“The most common instance of this is connected with the establishment of separate schools for white and colored children, which has been held to be a valid exercise of the legislative power even by courts of States where the political rights of the colored race have been longest and most earnestly enforced,” he said.
Brown added the telling remarks that have characterized the Court’s decision since.
“The argument also assumes that social prejudice may be overcome by legislation, and that equal rights cannot be secured except by an enforced commingling of the two races,” Brown said. “If the civil and political rights of both races be equal, one cannot be inferior to the other civilly or politically. If one race be inferior to the other socially, the Constitution of the United States cannot put them upon the same plane.”
The lone dissenter, Justice John Marshall Harlan, wrote, “In my opinion, the judgment this day rendered will, in time, prove to be quite as pernicious as the decision made by this tribunal in the Dred Scott Case (referencing the controversial 1857 decision about slavery).”
“Our Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens,” he added.
The decision of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka on May 17, 1954, overturned a Plessy decision that extended the Jim Crow era of discrimination for decades.
Chief Justice Earl Warren, writing for a unanimous Brown court in 1954, said that "We conclude that in the field of public education the doctrine of 'separate but equal' has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.” The Court said the defendants were “deprived of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment.”